|
|
|
L.T. Business Consultants is
participating with AEA Technology Engineering Services, Inc. and Equipos
Nucleares, S.A. in an international Consortium established in the year
1996, to test and validate the Mechanical Stress Improvement Process (MSIP)
for preventing or
mitigating stress corrosion cracking in operating nuclear power plant
Reactor Vessel Head CRDM penetrations.
|
 |
|
MSIP
is a patented process invented, developed and implemented to protect weldments
against stress corrosion cracking in nuclear power plants.
The presence of high tensile stresses in the weld region is one of the most
significant contributors to stress corrosion cracking. The mechanical process
developed by AEA Technology Engineering Services, Inc. (AEAT ES) involves
introducing small plastic strains to redistribute or remove the residual tensile
stress from the critical weld regions.
MSIP's typical application involves a slight circumferential contraction of the
pipe on one side of the weldment. Recently AEAT ES has developed a variant of
MSIP involving axial contraction for application to the CRDM penetrations in a
PWR RV Head, which would eliminate the potential stress corrosion cracking in
the penetration weldments.
|
 |
|
The basic concept of MSIP for piping welds is briefly described below.
A simple hydraulically operated clamp
(Figure 1) is used to locally contract the pipe in the direct vicinity
of the circumferential weld. The permanent contraction under the tool
generates a concave contour at the weld location and results in a corresponding
reduction of the pipe circumference
(Figure 2). The amount of contraction needed to complete the stress
redistribution depends on the geometry of the weld joint and materials.
Once the tool has been removed, the weldment remains in axial compression
through about half of the wall and is protected by a layer of compressive
hoop stress which extends almost all through the wall.
The generation of residual compressive stresses has been verified and
confirmed by independent tests. These include residual stress measurements
on 12" and 28" weldments by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)
for US NRC, pre-packed 28" pipe-to-elbow weldment by EPRI for BWR
Owners Group and several 12" nozzle-to-safe-end welds by EPRI.
At ANL, residual stresses on MSIP treated 12" and 28" weldments
were measured on the inner surface as well as through the wall. The stresses
on the inner surface were highly compressive in both the axial and hoop
directions ranging from -207N/mm2 to -345N/mm2 in
the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) for the 12" weldment and from the -152N/mm2
to -345N/mm2 in the HAZ for the 28" weldment. Through
wall axial residual stress distributions were almost linear across the
thickness near the HAZs and the compressive stresses were found to extend
for almost 50% of the wall thickness. Similar results were found for the
28" weldment
(Figure 3).
Two basic types of tools are used for applying the process. The stud tensioner
tool is typically used for standard weldments such as pipe-to-pipe and
pipe-to-elbow joints for sizes up to 14" in diameter. In the second
type, a specially designed hydraulic box press is used for bringing the
clamp halves together This type is typically used to squeeze heavy wall
nozzles and large diameter pipes. A portable hydraulic pump is used to
actuate the stud tensioner or box presses. Plant compressed air is used
for pump operation.
The process is applied using approved Engineering and Field Service Procedures.
Weld Travelers with Performance and Verification Records are used to document
application results and to record measurements and verification. The process
is displacement controlled and verification is provided by measuring pipe
contraction between circumference measurements before and after MSIP.
MSIP is accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in NUREG-0313
as a Stress Improvement (SI) method for mitigating stress corrosion cracking
in BWR plants. Early application of MSIP in existing piping systems eliminates
the otherwise inevitable need for piping replacement. Additionally, in
the U.S. context, the use of an NRC-approved stress remedy reduces
the required inspection frequency, thus reducing both outage time and
radiation exposure. EPRI information for the first application of MSIP
at Commonwealth Edison shows a saving of about US$430 million achieved
by avoiding pipe replacement in the utility's operating BWR plants. Use
of MSIP makes all the weldments in the system immune to stress corrosion
damage. By replacing 'as welded' residual tensile stresses with compressive
residual stresses in the weld inner surface, pre-existing cracks are arrested
and crack irritation prevented. The prevention application of MSIP is
fully justified considering not only potential losses related to repairs
and interrupted energy production, but also plant safety.
MSIP was first used to improve weldments in 1986. Since then over 1,300
welds including over 500 nozzles/safe-end weldments have been treated
in over 30 BWR plants worldwide
(See Table 1). Recently its use has been extended to PWR's in USA
for mitigating stress corrosion cracking in some Inconel safe-end weldments.
IF YOU WANT TO VIEW SOME
PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING MSIP EQUIPMENT AND FIELD APPLICATIONS CLICK
HERE.
|
 |
|
CRDM nozzles are usually shrunk fit in reactor
head penetrations and then welded to the dome on the inner side by partial penetration
J-welds. Since all the nozzles are vertical, the outer radial
locations require welding of the nozzle to the dome at angles of up to 47º.
Welding produces a complex pattern of residual stresses where the tensile
stresses are enhanced by significant ovalization of the nozzle extending inside
the dome. The pattern of stress becomes more complex after a hydrotest which
introduces local plastic yielding at the hole boundary and weld discontinuity.
The mechanical means of applying loads must be adapted to the complex geometry
of the CRDM penetration. Such loads can be imposed using a simple device with a
central rod extending through the penetration having a head at one end and a
hydraulic cylinder on the other (Figure 4). The imposed axial compressive stresses interact
with the as-welded circumferential tensile stresses to enhance plasticity.
The resulting plastic flow redistributes the residual stresses to remove tension
from the critical weldment region. After removing the imposed axial loads, both
the axial and the circumferential residual stresses are reduced to an almost
stress-free condition.
Two and three-dimensional inelastic finite element stress analyses were
performed on the central and outermost CRDM penetration weldments of typical RPV
head design to verify the concept.
Considering the CRDM penetration pattern in the Reactor Vessel Head (RVH), a
three dimensional pie-shaped segment of the RVH dome is modeled. This model
extends from the center of the head down to the flange connection. One side of
the model bisects the center of the outermost CRDM. The area in the vicinity of
this CRDM weldment to the RVH dome is modeled with a fine mesh to accurately
determine the resulting stresses. Such a shaped model allows symmetry boundary
conditions to be accurately applied to the model. The RVH flange is included in
the model to account for the effect of the flange stiffness on the deformation
and resulting stresses on the analyzed CRDM (Figure
5).
This model was used in comprehensive elastic-plastic analysis to demonstrate the
benefits of the MSIP for reducing residual stresses in the weldment to mitigate
stress corrosion cracking.
While analyses show that as-welded tensile stresses are reduced by axial
contraction of the nozzle, our results show even better improvement of stress
would be achieved if the penetrations are contracted when the RPV head is
subject to internal pressure, or when a difference in average temperature exists
between the RPV head shell and the Inconel penetration. This average temperature
difference should be in the order of 85º to 140º C. A combination of heating
and cooling would be applied locally to the RPV head penetration weldment being
treated with MSIP. The average temperature difference would eliminate the shrink
fit and, along with MSIP, improve stresses on the inner surface of the
penetration. The cooling process should take a few minutes to achieve the
desired cooldown and would be followed by an axial squeeze.
Initial hoop stresses within a range of 275-345N/mm2 tension are reduced, such that
after returning to operation, the tensile stresses remain low. Significant
improvement is obtained at all locations around the nozzle, below and above the
weld. Application of the process eliminates both the hoop and axial 'as-welded'
stresses above the weld as well as in the weld region and beneath it.
Qualification tests have been run at Equipos Nucleares, S.A (ENSA) factory
in Santander (Spain) to
verify the removal of the 'as-welded' residual stresses. Full
scale mock-ups have been designed and fabricated using the same
procedures as those used in an actual RV head. Residual stress measurements were
made before and after application of MSIP. Geometry and locations of
stress measurements are shown in Figure
6, Figure 7 and
Figure
8 show the level and distribution of stresses before and
after MSIP application. The attached photograph (Figure
9) shows the
stress measuring equipment designed by ENSA for measuring residual
stresses inside the penetration.
The following table summarizes the results:
|
| Residual axial weld stresses
(N/mm2) before
and after MSIP |
| a) at 113 mm from bottom |
|
0º |
90º |
180º |
270º |
|
Before
MSIP
|
179 |
-
262 |
138 |
-
324 |
| After
MSIP |
-
41 |
-
200 |
-
7 |
-
97 |
| b)
at 113 mm from bottom |
|
0º |
90º |
180º |
270º |
| Before
MSIP |
110 |
|
-
28 |
|
| After
MSIP |
-
48 |
|
-
103 |
|
| |
| Residual circumferential weld stresses
(N/mm2) before and after MSIP |
| a)
at 90 mm from bottom |
|
0º |
90º |
180º |
270º |
| Before
MSIP |
421 |
-
269 |
124 |
-
276 |
| After
MSIP |
90 |
-
152 |
0 |
-
83 |
| b)
at 90 mm from bottom |
|
0º |
90º |
180º |
270º |
| Before
MSIP |
241 |
|
179 |
|
| After
MSIP |
48 |
|
-
14 |
|
|
|
The results show that the tensile stresses are either removed or reduced to such
low levels as to be below the threshold of corrosion cracking.
It should be noted that the Inconel 600 used in the mock-up was conservatively
chosen with a high yield strength of 518 N/mm2. This is considerably
higher than the typical yield strength values for Inconel 600 which are in the
order of 300 N/mm2. Even with such high yield strength material, the
process was able to eliminate or reduce the tensile 'as-welded' residual
stresses to begin levels along the inner surface of the penetration. For the normal yield
strength values, it is expected that the tensile
stresses will be completely removed.
|
 |
|
The analyses and qualification tests performed by the AEAT-ENSA-LT Consortium have verified the applicability
and effectiveness of MSIP to
eliminate residual weld stresses present in PWR RVH CRDM Inconel 600
penetrations, thus providing protection against
stress corrosion cracking.
For CRDM penetrations, MSIP represents a cost-effective means to extend the life
of operating RV heads and additional protection for new or replacement Reactor
Vessel Heads.
IF
YOU NEED MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MSIP PLEASE CONTACT US BY EMAIL
|
 |
To obtain additional information about
other activities of LT partners please click below:
|